I’m still undecided on the bailout (though I’m 98% opposed to it), but I do like Jeff Jarvis’ perspective on the $700 billion. Among a list of national initiatives which would cost less than $700 billion, he highlights:
- We could be spending a lot less to get a lot more. A national wi-max buildout would cost between $5 billion and $14.5 billion.
- We could provide broadband access to every one of those homes for about $300 a year.
- We could buy 3.5 billion One Laptop Per Child machines.
- Or we could give 4.4 million Americans free college educations at private institutions.
- we could more than triple total annual R&D spending in the U.S. I can’t find total R&D on alternative energy but with this money we could multiply what Google.org is spending by a factor of 35,000.
Of course, I’d be almost sure to oppose any kind of government-based distribution of $700 billion (especially assuming that’s taxpayer funded), but Jarvis’ ideas definitely pique my continuing interest in large-scale private, action-based wealth distribution plans and how they might shape our world.








Added on Thu Sep 25, 2008 @ 7:32 pm
the link on my last post (the nader one) to his interview on democracy now! is good, i think he lays it out pretty clearly why and how it is very bad. what do those responsible for the crisis learn? that they can continue on and the government will bail them out with taxpayers dollars. this to me isn’t partisan at all, it’s bad no matter what side of the coin on your on…unless you’re one of those being bailed out.
Comment by: timothy allen brown | Permanent link